Monday, September 26, 2011

Burma: the transition has not really started. A CPJ report.

The "quasi-civilian" Burmese government formed after the flawed November 2010 elections tries to prove that it is really on the way to reform the country's authorititarian rule. Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi has been referring to "positive developments" lately and the Brussels-based and respected International Crisis Group has just published a report highlighting that "major reform is underway".
Although some measures have been taken to reduce a little bit the suffocating atmosphere of censorship and official news control (the websites of international human rights NGOs and of exile media have been accessible since mid-September) the situation of press freedom remains dire, notes a new report of the Committee to Protect Journalists. More substantive changes will be needed if we are to believe in a "new beginning" in a country that has suffered for decades the iron rule of military dictatorship.
Please for more info, read
The CPJ report
http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/09/in-burma-transition-neglects-press-freedom.php
The ICG report
http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/south-east-asia/burma-myanmar/B127-myanmar-major-reform-underway.aspx
My column in Le Soir (in French)
http://www.lesoir.be/debats/chroniques/2011-09-20/la-laque-de-la-transition-birmane-864412.php

A campaign to stop the Obiang Prize at UNESCO

UNESCO must stop discredited prize

New York, September 26, 2011—UNESCO should reject a new bid to honor Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, the president of Equatorial Guinea and now Africa's longest serving ruler, with a prize in his name, a group of nine human rights organizations said today.

UNESCO’s executive board, which is meeting in Paris until October 6, 2011, is to consider a proposal for a $3 million UNESCO life sciences prize, to be funded by the “Obiang Nguema Mbasogo Foundation for the Preservation of Life.” The prize was suspended last year after an outcry from concerned Equatoguineans, human rights groups, anti-corruption campaigners, and prominent literary, scientific, and cultural figures.

An effort by the Obiang government to reinstate the prize in May failed to make it onto the agenda. But the current initiative has the nominal support of other African countries following an African Union resolution at its summit meeting in Equatorial Guinea in July, which President Obiang hosted as this year’s AU chairman.

“UNESCO should not honor President Obiang,” said Tutu Alicante, of the nongovernmental human rights organization EG Justice. “If he wishes to fund science and education around the world, he should start with his own country, where many still lack basic services such as electricity and clean water, while the president and his family flaunt an extravagant lifestyle that is the subject of legal investigations around the world.”

According to evidence produced in 2004 and 2010 investigations by the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, President Obiang and close family members have diverted tens of millions of dollars from their country's natural resource earnings to their private benefit.

The 2010 US State Department  human rights report decried “official corruption at all levels of government” and noted that “[t]he president and members of his inner circle continued to amass personal profits from the oil windfall.” Equatorial Guinea is consistently ranked among the most corrupt countries on the globe by Transparency International.

The $3 million UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences was set up in 2008 but has never been awarded. Implementation of the prize was frozen pending further discussion in June 2010. In October, the UNESCO Executive Board voted to suspend it until a consensus on the matter could be reached by member states.

That action came about after prominent African figures, Latin American writers, Nobel laureates, scientists and public health professionals, press freedom groups, Cano prize winners, and rights organizations from around the world came together in an unprecedented effort to challenge the prize, citing serious concerns about President Obiang’s record of corruption and abuse.

Public figures involved in the campaign against the prize have included: Nobel laureates Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, Wole Soyinka, Mario Vargas Llosa, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, and John Polanyi; author Chinua Achebe; human rights advocate Graça Machel; and over sixty professionals from Equatorial Guinea.

Critics of the prize have highlighted the contrast between the mandate of UNESCO to promote human rights along with its work to defend free expression, and the record of severe repression and official corruption that have marked President Obiang’s 32-year rule. Severe restrictions on press freedom, together with self-censorship, make it difficult for citizens of Equatorial Guinea to challenge the government from inside the country over sensitive topics such as ongoing foreign investigations into the alleged corruption of President Obiang and his close associates. The government has been repeatedly condemned by UN and other human rights monitors for its systematic use of torture. Recent elections have been criticized as neither free nor fair.

Oil and gas exploitation has made Equatorial Guinea the wealthiest country in sub-saharan Africa in per capita income, yet the International Monetary Fund and others have expressed concern that government spending on social needs is very low in light of its high levels of poverty. According to an analysis by the Economist Intelligence Unit, Equatorial Guinea spends less on education as a percentage of GDP than neighboring countries such as Cameroon and Gabon.

In August 2010 President Obiang's government shocked the world when it executed four dissident exiles within an hour after a summary military proceeding found them guilty of treason and attempted assassination.

The following organizations signed the statement:

  • Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos de España
  • Association Sherpa
  • Center for Economic and Social Rights
  • Committee to Protect Journalists
  • EG Justice
  • Global Witness
  • Human Rights Watch
  • Media Legal Defence Initiative
  • Open Society Justice Initiative

Friday, September 16, 2011

Unesco inter-UN meeting on fighting impunity in journalists' murders

I took part on Wednesday in a UN Inter-agency meeting convened in Paris by UNESCO. This organization which has among its mandate the defense of press freedom (as illustrated by the World Press Freedom Day each year on the 3rd of May and the Unesco/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize) relayed the concerns raised by the high level of attacks against the press around the world and the extent of impunity for murderers.
Prepared by a series of meetings, especially in April 2010 in New York at the initiative of CPJ and last June in London under the auspices of City University and the University of Sheffield, the Paris meeting was attended by representatives of the top world press freedom groups (CPJ, IFJ, RSF, IPI, INSI, etc.), the major press defenders within the intergovernmental system (Frank LaRue, Dunja Mijatovic, etc.) and representatives of various UN agencies, without forgetting delegates (sometimes rather defensive...) of UNESCO member states.
Elisabeth Witchel, my CPJ colleague and CPJ's Global Impunity Campaign consultant, wrote an excellent summary of the meeting.
Please read:
http://www.cpj.org/blog/2011/09/un-plan-on-journalist-security-could-bring-improve.php

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Keeping the Syria revolt and repression online

Syria is one of the toughest news assignments. Foreign journalists are banned and take great risks if they try to sneak into the country. So how do we get some news about the revolt and the repression? Through daring online activisist like the ones described here in this BBC report.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14914765

How Wikileaks blew it : an Ethiopian journalist under fire


The risk that human rights defenders and journalists might get into trouble if their names would appear in the State Department cables distributed  by Wikileaks has become reality. As denounced yesterday by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) an Ethiopian journalist Argaw Ashine was summoned by officials of the Government Communications Affairs Office after his name appeared in one the cables. He decided safer to flee the country. 
Read the whole story here:


Friday, September 9, 2011

South Sudan: how to respect press freedom in a newly independent country


It seems to be a pattern when a people fights for its independance or liberation and then its leaders accede to power. Journalists who were seen as supporters of the cause are suddenly subject to mistrust and submitted to censorship and repression.
It happened in Nicaragua in the early 80s when the Sandinista government started harassing the daily La Prensa, although the Revolution had been triggered by the murder  of Pedro Joaquin Chamorro, the editor of this liberal newspaper; by thugs linked to the Somoza dictatorship.
It happened in Eritrea and Ethiopia and it is happening now in South Sudan.
Tom Rhodes, CPJ representative in Africa, has just written a very enlightening reportage on how the South Sudanese media confront the new rulers, most of them having been formed by their military struggles with no real sense of what democracy means.
For further information, please go to the CPJ blog:   
http://www.cpj.org/blog/2011/09/south-sudans-struggle-for-a-free-press.php

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

UN Inter-agency meeting in Paris on violence against journalists and impunity


A big UN Inter-agency meeting on the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity will be held on 13-14 september 2011 at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris. It will bring together UN officials, press freedom groups like CPJ (Committee to Protect Journalists), INSI (International News Safety Institute) or RSF (Reporters without Borders), as well as academics, especially from City University (London) and the University of Sheffield that have launched an initiative for an international framework to protect journalists from violence and to counter impunity.
Interesting documents can be found at the both university journalism websites

http://www.city.ac.uk/centre-for-law-justice-and-journalism 
http://www.cfom.org.uk/

9/11: an IFJ conference on Journalism in the shadows of terror laws

Journalists have been victims of terrorist organizations: let us remember Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl or Libération special envoy Florence Aubenas who was held hostages for months in Iraq. Many have been murdered. Many have been intimidated.
Journalists have also been victims of counterterrorism. They have been targeted, arrested, detained, spied upon or banned from doing their job in conflict zones.
Ten years after 9/11 the International Federation of Journalists is organizing a high-level conference in Brussels on 10 and 11 September with top officials, journalists that have been affected by terror or counterterror and leaders of press freedom organizations. The objective: assess what has happend after that fateful day and come out with a strong commitment to fight back lawless groups and reclaim the high ground for press freedom in the battle between security and liberty.
To have more information go to: http://www.ifj.org/en/pages/ifj-conference-on-journalism-in-the-shadow-of-terror-laws

Monday, September 5, 2011

Human Rights Watch launches a prize honoring a human rights photographer

Photojournalism is intimitaly linked to the human rights story. Remember Capa and Taro in the Spanish civil war or Larry Burrows in Vietnam. Human Rights Watch which has been in the forefront of working with photojournalists to document abuses and to mobilize public opinion has established with World Press Photo an annual "visual journalism award" and it has named it after the late Tim Hetherington, killed in Libya on April 20 together with Chris Hondros.
To have more, please read:
http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/09/04/visual-journalism-grant-honor-tim-hetherington

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Ukraine: a breakthrough in the Gongadze case

The killing of Ukrainian investigative journalist Georgy Gongadze in 2000 was a shock. The suspicion that he had been the victim of foul play by top authorities gave a special significance to the case. And impunity seemed to be the rule, as in so many murders of journalists around the world.

Until yesterday, when the major suspect, a former general, admitted to the killing and directly implicated the former president Kuchma in the conspiracy to kill the journalist.

Please read the CPJ coverage: 
http://www.cpj.org/2011/08/gongadze-suspect-admits-to-killing-implicates-kuch.php

Are local "foreign correspondents" better than foreigners?


Are local correspondents of international media better or less free than the traditional foreign correspondent? The question has been debated for many years, some arguing that local correspondents provide a wealth of knowledge, contacts and context that expatriate journalists and parachute journalists cannot offer. Others however fear that local correspondents can be more fearful of speaking truth to power, more vulnerable to pressures and at times too partisan due to their local affiliations and identities.
The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the University of Oxford have recently published an interesting study on this issue, focused on the behaviour of correspondents in Khartoum (Sudan).
Titled The new foreign correspondent at work: local-national stringers and the global news coverage of conflict in Darfur and written by Mel Bunce, this 31 page essay concludes that the “increased reliance on local-national foreign correspondents poses a challenge to the discursive nature of reporting at some of the most established and trusted news outlets in the world. "A particular concerning finding (is that) Sudanese journalists were disinclined to write critical reports”.
An interesting study, although limited in its scope (there are a dozen foreign correspondents in Sudan) and its meaning (what about the locals versus internationals in democratic countries?), it raises however important issues linked to the new trends in international journalism.